Capital Punishment

-

Topic: Capital Punishment

This can be a sensitive issue for many people. Path doctrine is not exclusively for or against capital punishment, but only the most heinous crimes, committed by the unrepentant -such as serial killers, especially if cannibalism was involved, or people who murder their children- should qualify for what is essentially putting down a rabid animal. In those cases, the death of a murderer may be the only way the victims’ families may have some sort of closure.  Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer come to mind as examples.

We also need to develop a humane and painless way to perform executions. If we must resort to killing somebody, we need to do it with as much Compassion as possible. Not only for their sake, but for our own as well, to prove to ourselves that we are not also monsters. Remember that Compassion requires a certain degree of emotional distance; we only seek vengeance when we allow our emotions to overrule our rational selves. Path doctrine is to always determine the most Compassionate reaction to evil, as “Everything that does evil is in pain.” (Clive Barker, Imajica). If such evil is done that it can be safely determined that the individual is intrinsically broken beyond rehabilitation, then the most Compassionate thing to do is to humanely euthanize them and end their suffering. This is what Doloris pointed out during a previous meeting.

However, new evidence, particularly DNA evidence, has exonerated eighteen people on death row, so the burden of proof and amount of evidence must be carefully weighed. The American justice system is deeply flawed, especially when it comes to public defenders in criminal cases. There are innocent people in prison, some of whom may die before their case is reviewed, and their blood is on all our hands. It is more Compassionate in some cases to let them live their lives in prison, unable to hurt anyone else but not killed, just in case it turns out we were wrong.

In the end, it must be acknowledged that while some people allow themselves to become monsters, how we deal with them tells us a lot about who we are as a society. We have hanged, electrocuted, shot, gassed, and chemically euthanized them. While we have made some progress in finding a painless way to put people to death, we still need to be more judicious about who we kill.

There’s some positive news, though: Capital punishment has been on a more or less steady decline since 2000. (Source: Statista.com) This is a good thing. It means fewer lives taken, but it also indicates a decrease in the kind of crime that comes with a death sentence. Violent crime overall is down across America. Maybe this is a good time to reassess our values as a nation and make absolutely certain we are in the right before we deem somebody irrevocably broken and condemn them to die.

Would you like to share your own personal views on capital punishment?

Namaste.

Reverend CJ Carlin

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Sacrifice and the Path

-
  On Sacrifice and the Path   Sacrifice is a prevailing theme of many world religions, whether you are giving up life, time, or money. The idea is that you have to pay for salvation somehow; nothing is free, after all. Some religions have an entire laundry list of things you cannot do, things you must give up entirely in order to practice their faith. Some ask for money, either through tithes or “charitable donations.” The entire Christian faith is based on what is an objectively barbaric form of human sacrifice. The message is clear: to be saved, you must offer up something in return, or forgo something you once indulged in. A sacrifice must be made. Pagan spiritual traditions incorporate energetic reciprocity: to invoke the favors of the gods, certain offerings are made. These offerings can be physical or energetic in nature, either cream and honey to please the Fae folk, or personal psychic energy expended during a healing rite. These sacrifices are more personal (as ...
Read more

Beware the False Dichotomy

-
  The appeal of the dichotomy is understandable. It’s psychologically soothing to have two clear options, so we can act accordingly. Unfortunately, life is messy and complicated, and many of the dichotomies we embrace as a society are not only false, they are actively damaging. Consider the false dichotomy of “fight or flight,” of which I’ve written before. If you believe you only have two possible responses to perceived threat of trauma, you won’t realize that freeze, flop, and friend may be more appropriate to the situation. You could end up punching your boss, because running away is for cowards. Even worse, however, are the dichotomies we apply to sex, sexuality, and gender: you’re either gay or straight, male or female. What we are finally beginning to acknowledge is that these things exist on a spectrum, and the old labels just don’t work anymore. But there are still those who cling to these false dichotomies and refuse to recognize anyone’s identity if it doesn’t fit in ...
Read more

Path Doctrine on the Seven Deadly Sins

-
  Topic: Path Doctrine on the Seven Deadly Sins Today’s sermon is about the Christian list of seven “deadly sins” and how they relate to Path teachings. Some of these so-called sins are of the body, some are of the mind. But they must be subject to rational dissection so we can extract whatever value they may have. Lust is a body sin, and an easy one. The sex lives of others are none of our business, as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult and no harm is being done. If you are not hurting anyone or treating other people as things, feel free to lust after and even have sex with as many people as you want. Greed is one of the sins that you only commit in your head; the only problem with greed is that it can turn you into a power-hungry asshole. But there are wealthy people who still try to make the world a better place, so there is nothing wrong with greed itself. Gluttony is a body sin, and is contrary to the Virtue of Balance. If you find yourself overindulging, ...
Read more