Scientific Literacy

-

Core Tenet #4 & Scientific Literacy

Today we are talking about Core Tenet #4 regarding scientific literacy and how it applies to two topics that are often misunderstood by the average layperson: the distinction between sex and gender, and genetically modified organisms.

GMO’s are actually everywhere. Unless you somehow own a tame wolf, coyote, or fox, your dog is a genetically modified organism. The strawberries you find in the store, unless they were picked wild, are genetically modified organisms. Oranges and most other citrus fruit are the result of thousands of years of genetic modification. Bananas were barely edible before human intervention created the berry (yes, bananas are berries) we know and love today. Prior to its domestication and modification, corn would have about ten kernels per ear. If we really had to label foods that do not occur “naturally” as a “GMO” you would have to stamp half the produce department. It is called “selective breeding” and we have been doing it ever since we found out we could, thousands of years ago. Just because we did not know what genes were at the time, does not mean it was not genetic manipulation. It is also practically a tradition at this point to apply the latest scientific advancements to the modification process. Where once we used a hatchet and hoped for the best, now we can use a scalpel and fine-tune the desired changes. We can make things better: Golden rice is fortified to produce Vitamin A and is used in areas that suffer from a shortage of Vitamin A. Of course, ignorant activists oppose it, because it is a “GMO” and that is one current boogeyman that the scientifically illiterate have decided they are against. Monsanto may be a horrible company, with horrible practices, but so is Wal-Mart. We do not villianize the things you can buy at Wal-Mart, and it is unfair to condemn all genetic manipulation due to the actions of one terrible company that uses it. Let your mind be a scalpel and cut the truth out of the matrix of mis-information, propaganda, and deliberate falsification of data. In other words, learn about your topic before you perpetuate bullshit.

Another thing we need to remember that what we were taught in grade school about biology was intended to be a foundation, not an exhaustive or comprehensive education on genes and hormones and how they can affect the body’s physical presentation. We are obligated, as thinking human beings, to learn more than we learned as children, about everything. This is especially true if you have strong opinions about a subject and you want to express them publicly. If you declare that there are only two sexes, dammit, or the tired old “boys have a penis, girls have a vagina” thing that was not really funny the first time, you are just demonstrating your ignorance. Genetically speaking, biological sex is messier than the tidy binary that people want to believe. There are about six biologial sexes, based on genes and hormones. Then, of course, there is gender identity, which may or may not align with the sex a person was assigned at birth. Gender expression is purely a social construct, at this point divorced from any kind of biological restriction, as it should be. Women do not have to be traditionally feminine if they do not choose to be, any more than men are required to exhibit traditionally masculine traits. Most of the hack comedians whose whole schtick is about “the differences between men and women” are just perpetuating tired old stereotypes that have not really been true for decades, if they ever were. I would posit that most of the “feminine” or “masculine” things we do are the result of socialization rather than biological impetus, which makes them subject to change. We are seeing such changes now, as more and more people choose to express a more nuanced gender identity rather than the strict binary we were raised with.

Did any of the ideas presented in this sermon challenge your previously-held beliefs? If so, are you going to adapt your worldview, or do you simply reject the new information?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Sacrifice and the Path

-
  On Sacrifice and the Path   Sacrifice is a prevailing theme of many world religions, whether you are giving up life, time, or money. The idea is that you have to pay for salvation somehow; nothing is free, after all. Some religions have an entire laundry list of things you cannot do, things you must give up entirely in order to practice their faith. Some ask for money, either through tithes or “charitable donations.” The entire Christian faith is based on what is an objectively barbaric form of human sacrifice. The message is clear: to be saved, you must offer up something in return, or forgo something you once indulged in. A sacrifice must be made. Pagan spiritual traditions incorporate energetic reciprocity: to invoke the favors of the gods, certain offerings are made. These offerings can be physical or energetic in nature, either cream and honey to please the Fae folk, or personal psychic energy expended during a healing rite. These sacrifices are more personal (as ...
Read more

Beware the False Dichotomy

-
  The appeal of the dichotomy is understandable. It’s psychologically soothing to have two clear options, so we can act accordingly. Unfortunately, life is messy and complicated, and many of the dichotomies we embrace as a society are not only false, they are actively damaging. Consider the false dichotomy of “fight or flight,” of which I’ve written before. If you believe you only have two possible responses to perceived threat of trauma, you won’t realize that freeze, flop, and friend may be more appropriate to the situation. You could end up punching your boss, because running away is for cowards. Even worse, however, are the dichotomies we apply to sex, sexuality, and gender: you’re either gay or straight, male or female. What we are finally beginning to acknowledge is that these things exist on a spectrum, and the old labels just don’t work anymore. But there are still those who cling to these false dichotomies and refuse to recognize anyone’s identity if it doesn’t fit in ...
Read more

Path Doctrine on the Seven Deadly Sins

-
  Topic: Path Doctrine on the Seven Deadly Sins Today’s sermon is about the Christian list of seven “deadly sins” and how they relate to Path teachings. Some of these so-called sins are of the body, some are of the mind. But they must be subject to rational dissection so we can extract whatever value they may have. Lust is a body sin, and an easy one. The sex lives of others are none of our business, as long as everyone involved is a consenting adult and no harm is being done. If you are not hurting anyone or treating other people as things, feel free to lust after and even have sex with as many people as you want. Greed is one of the sins that you only commit in your head; the only problem with greed is that it can turn you into a power-hungry asshole. But there are wealthy people who still try to make the world a better place, so there is nothing wrong with greed itself. Gluttony is a body sin, and is contrary to the Virtue of Balance. If you find yourself overindulging, ...
Read more